Shifting
the Burden…February 2007
What good are bits when I need atoms! It has not been
all that many years since certain leading proponents of “computers
for everything” pronounced that the world was in the midst
of a fundamental shift from working with atoms (in the form of
paper) to bits (in the form of computer data). Those were
the heady days of the paperless office about-to-arrive. Of
course, now we know that it didn’t exactly turn out that
way. Today we create more paper than ever.
However, who ends up having to create all this paper and what
this does to enhance or mess up our day is what is beginning to
bother me more and more -- mainly because I am beginning to realize
that others may be taking advantage of me. Furthermore, the
problem is not only that it’s a minor inconvenience of having
to print out a few pages. Let me share a real-life example
with you.
A few days ago, I received a shiny little computer disk by FedEx
that was meant to provide me with information so that I could participate
in the selection of a “best product” award in several
categories. In past years, this information came by way of
a stack of papers that contained the nomination forms with all
the back-up material attached. The process of getting to
an answer was a relatively easy one.
To do my evaluations and make my recommendations, I would start
by sorting through the stack and picking out the ones that seemed
most interesting. Then I would glance at the back-up information
and continue to rearrange the stack by doing a comparative ranking – this
one is better than the one above it, and so forth. Sometimes
I would conclude the process by spreading all the nominations out
on a large table to do the final comparative rankings. It
would not be long before the final order emerged with the satisfaction
that I had examined all the important information provided and
answered all the pertinent questions.
Now, let’s compare what I have just described to the shiny
computer disk approach. I put the disk in the usual computer
slot and opened it. And what did I find in front of me on
the screen? There were approximately fifty FOLDERS – not
just files, folders. Each folder, with its short and cryptic
title, contained not only the nomination form, but also all the
back-up information in several more files and photo images.
So how could I easily go through all this information to create
order out of chaos? Should I try to read the documents one-by-one? If
so, how would I remember what I read about product eighteen, or
was it product twenty-seven? And how did product twenty-two
compare to product five? I was already getting confused
by the time I was reading about product number four. How
could I possibly retain all my impressions to achieve a decent
ranking by the time I finished reading? And not only that,
I also didn’t have the time or patience to try to absorb
so much information one page at a time. My preference was
to begin the sorting process immediately. The more I tried
to make some sense of all this, the more frustrated I became.
So, why did I end up with a computer disk instead of information
in the printed paper form that I could use? Well, of course
-- it was easier for the sender. The person on the other
end did not have to worry about making multiple copies of all the
information. They did not have to put together packages to
mail. They just created the disk and then could burn as many
copies as they wished and the burden would be on me to figure out
how to make the information unraveling useful. Unfortunately,
the end result in this case was that all I could do was to print
out the cover pages of each nomination, and then go back and forth
within all the folders and files and try to do my best to arrive
at an ordered selection. By only having one page at a time
available to me, I’m not at all sure that I didn’t
miss something important.
Isn’t there something that we in the display community could
do to satisfy both the needs of those who don’t want to take
(or don’t have) the time to put information into a conveniently
usable form, as well as those who wish to have access to more than
one page at a time? One possibility would be to have a display
that is much larger than the ones we commonly use today with our
computers – let’s say desktop size. Then we could
electronically spread all these files and folders onto our desktops
and begin to move them around like pieces of paper on a large table. One
mandatory requirement would have to be an abstract or a small image
that would tell us key information about each file so that we could
instantly recognize it and be able to use this concise information
as a sorting tool. The back-up information would be quickly
accessible by clicking on the information abstract – like
we do now on a typical desktop icon. I think a display of
about 50 or 60-inch diagonal would suit us just fine for this task.
However, the resolution would have to be quite good. In
order to display the information at the same lines per inch as
on our current computer monitors, we would need at least 3,000
lines and maybe as many as 5,000. Don’t you think that
a display of that size and resolution would start to get really
interesting for sorting the larger amounts of information? Making
such a large high-resolution display at an affordable cost could
keep us display engineers busy for at least a few more years.
In general, I have not been able to find all that many interesting
applications for high-resolution displays. I have never been
much of a believer in higher resolution just for its own sake. But
here is an application that would be quite useful and cannot be
adequately implemented unless we do have the higher resolution
available. Will we make such a display or will we come up
with some other way to sort and order large amounts of information?
Until we do, I have decided that I am going to decline any future
offers sent to me on shiny little disks.
If you have some good alternate suggestions on how to deal with
this information acquisition and sorting problem, please send me
your thoughts. I’ll willingly give them a try – especially
since we don’t yet have that 60-inch high-resolution desktop
available to us. You may contact me directly from this
site, by e-mail at silzars@attglobal.net,
by phone at 425-898-9117, or by fax at 425-898-1727.
|